Organization Name – Veritasprotocol

Category – Artificial Intelligence (AI)

About

powered by irmaAI

Veritas Protocol claims AI-driven smart-contract auditing at “90 percent faster and 10 percent of the cost” of traditional audit firms — quantitative claims that are unusually specific for a project at this stage. The thesis is reasonable. LLMs have demonstrably improved at code reasoning, and Solidity vulnerability detection is a domain where automated approaches have made real progress (Slither, Mythril, Echidna predate the LLM era; the Veritas claim is that AI can do better than rule-based static analysis).

The verifiable surface is mid-pack. The X handle is certified at 39,753… followers, total audience 54,079. Marketing efficiency at MES 8.75 (14th percentile, Medium trust). The VPT token is referenced on BASE but the file does not record a CEX listing. ICO-tracker icodrops.com lists the project, and Binance shows a token-info page — both checkable independently.

The team page lists two co-founders: Marko Vidrih (LinkedIn-verified) and Jan Vidic (unverified). For a project selling smart-contract security to clients who would themselves be subject to liability for the contracts they ship, verified-CTO-or-Head-of-Audit identity is the next-cheapest move after verified-CEO. The current state — one of two co-founders verified — is acceptable but not optimal.

The “90% faster, 10% cost” claim is the kind of quantitative statement that benefits from a published benchmark. Numbers move when they can be checked. Veritas would help itself by publishing the methodology behind the comparison, the audit firms it was benchmarked against, and the vulnerability classes the AI catches versus misses. Without that, the claim reads as marketing rather than measurement.

On verification: none of the six RMA pillars has been submitted. Within VaaSBlock’s AI category Veritas sits at rank 24 of 41. Read More